Well now seems like we have a hot peppered pickle here now don't we...

Assignment #3
An impolite response to http://iamshane.com/2009/05/09/of-atms-iphones-and-911/

As I read about the vegen atheist known as Shane Becker, I decided that although he may not have had malicious intentions he was however brash, condescending, and (for lack of a better term) disrespectful.
I am in no way saying that Mr. Becker doesn't bring up valid points on the matters of corrupt corporate and societal flaws and policies. I am merely trying to correlate that as a member of a community one shows support of said community by frivolously spending monies in a favored establishment and further if one does not wish to abide societies and corporate policies and bylaws then perhaps they shouldn't:
A) Complain to the establishment in turn making matters worse for themselves. Or,
B) Disrespect persons of authority whilst they work by way of perpetuating the altercation to begin with. Or even,
C) Try to force their way of thinking and or opinions AND then get upset because everybody doesn't agree with your Point of View, thats why there is a such a thing as an atheist(for example) in the first place.

So just as much as Mr. Becker has rights so does Loomis and REI. So who really is at fault? Personally I blame capitalism and corporate greed. C'est le Ve.